1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice

[Discussion] A Magic Kryss ?

Discussion in 'UO Rares Collector' started by Chiera, Feb 11, 2009.

  1. Chiera

    Chiera Guest

    Doing my personal micro-sosarian spring cleaning I found this one. A Kryss with the yellow label 'A Magic Kryss' and it is a repond slayer. Can anyone enlighten me where I did get this one from ?
    I mean, it was in a box with pre AOS charged weapons (I kept things like charged superslayers then), so it might be a transformed pre AOS Kryss. The others don't have such a label though. So I am a little confused right now. Anyone knows more ?

    thanks
     
  2. Chiera

    Chiera Guest

    think I solved the puzzle myself by now. Seems like Repond slayers from before AOS actually transfered to the "A magic ... " title. So nothing very special about that item. Thought I'd share it because the title might tempt some to make more of the thing than it actually is ;)
     
  3. Flutter

    Flutter Always Present
    Stratics Veteran Alumni Stratics Legend

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    21,553
    Likes Received:
    3,840
    Some of the slayer weapons from pre-aos made it through the publish without getting their titles changed. It's a bug that really no one is sure about. I understand that if you use an item wand or item ID on it the weapon will convert into a regular titled weapon. I have never tried it so I am not sure how true it is.
     
  4. Chiera

    Chiera Guest

    yes, as far a my little sample is concerned it's like all the other super slayer types transformed correctly, so only the Durability line on top indicates their age, whereas all the repond ones kept the 'A magic ...' but actually show the repond property, which confused me in the first place. If they weren't ID'd before and somehow the transform to AOS had glitched it should not show that property as well.