1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice

Arizona Poised to Outlaw Trolling

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by Taylor, Apr 4, 2012.

  1. Taylor

    Taylor Former Stratics CEO (2011-2014)
    Professional VIP Stratics Veteran Supporter Alumni Campaign Benefactor Alumni

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    8,023
    Likes Received:
    1,714
  2. Cirno

    Cirno Purple Pony Princess
    Stratics Veteran Alumni

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    224
    With the laws that actually make it through, I shudder to think how poorly thought out the ones that don't make it are.
     
  3. Taylor

    Taylor Former Stratics CEO (2011-2014)
    Professional VIP Stratics Veteran Supporter Alumni Campaign Benefactor Alumni

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2008
    Messages:
    8,023
    Likes Received:
    1,714
    The trick is to fill laws with lots of earmarks and unrelated appropriations in order to make it really long, then pass it before anyone has a chance to read it all and say, "What the hell?"
     
  4. RhyssaFireheart

    RhyssaFireheart Visitor

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2012
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    6
    Arizona seems to have become a black hole of concentrated stupidity. Remember, this is the state that tried to pass a law saying that employers could ask for a doctor's note to prove women weren't taking HBC for contraceptive reasons before the employer would cover the medication under insurance.
     
  5. Cirno

    Cirno Purple Pony Princess
    Stratics Veteran Alumni

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    961
    Likes Received:
    224
    I see two main questions, really.
    Firstly, where's the line supposed to be drawn?
    Secondly, how the hell do they expect to enforce it?

    The only way I can see it as anything but a waste of whatever resources went into throwing it together is in cases where a person's been internet bullied to a really bad point, and it becomes a charge that can't be as easily wiggled out of on a technicality.
    But either way, shouldn't bringing a law into being carry with it some semblance of enforcement?
     
  6. Mirt

    Mirt Certifiable
    Stratics Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2009
    Messages:
    1,726
    Likes Received:
    286
    This was one of the responce laws to what happen at Rutgers I bet. Its pretty much impossible to make folks be nice but now the world is getting more complicated. I would bet this one will not pass the courts muster and need to be redone.
     
  7. Vlaude

    Vlaude Lore Keeper
    Stratics Veteran Alumni Stratics Legend

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2003
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    57
    Eh. The term "trolling" takes on so many definitions now that it's hard to nail down just one. Trolling and cyber bullying were once clearly distinct but now the two terms are used interchangeably. The language in the bill seems to be targeting cyber bullying more than trolling, although the word "annoy" could apply to either term. Any serious online threat of physical violence should certainly be dealt with by local law enforcements, governments, etc. on a case by case basis. But people just clowning around or winding up others is another story. That's my opinion anyway.