1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice

(Player Event) Closed

Discussion in 'UO Siege Perilous' started by Baby Doll, Dec 18, 2012.

  1. Baby Doll

    Baby Doll Lore Keeper
    Stratics Veteran IPKU

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2008
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    466
    Thanks!
     
    #1 Baby Doll, Dec 18, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 29, 2012
    Sprago and Tjalle like this.
  2. SMASH33

    SMASH33 Visitor

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    2
    tbh i think this is a great idea but i dont think an entire guild should be held accountable for 1 person.(everyone pays their sub to play how they want) but i do agree that if the join party pvp against the party should not occur and if it did then that person should not be allowed back to do these hunts EVER again unless they want to host and take the chance of dealing with these issues themselves. But all in all this is cool since i cannot solo peerless stuff with my little thrower :D especially without the proper gear.
     
  3. Baby Doll

    Baby Doll Lore Keeper
    Stratics Veteran IPKU

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2008
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    466

    My thinking of holding guild accountable, is to discourage the back stabber from having guildmates waiting outside the peerless site for a massive gank! And the next day take the offenders buddy joins the party for a replay of the day before! Have a better solution?
     
    #3 Baby Doll, Dec 18, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2012
  4. SMASH33

    SMASH33 Visitor

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    2
    thats would be a different scenario than i depicted from the 1st message but if that was the case then i would not allow the entire guild then. i was under the impression of the single individual turning over on someone in the party. but if there was an ambush then i agree with you
     
  5. Baby Doll

    Baby Doll Lore Keeper
    Stratics Veteran IPKU

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2008
    Messages:
    817
    Likes Received:
    466
    That's cool! I have plans of making this happen. I posted for the suggestions on making it work.Thank you for your input!
     
  6. Tjalle

    Tjalle Grand Inquisitor
    Professional Stratics Veteran Campaign Supporter Gilfane

    Joined:
    May 12, 2008
    Messages:
    4,841
    Likes Received:
    1,294
    Sounds like a good idea that I hope will last. Especially good for those not in a guild to be able to do some hunts.

    And I think you pretty much covered it all. CanĀ“t think of anything to add. Might be some incidents while you test the waters but after a while it should go smoothly.
     
  7. SMASH33

    SMASH33 Visitor

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    2
    staying commited to the cause is key :D
     
  8. Donal Mor

    Donal Mor Lore Keeper
    Stratics Veteran Stratics Legend LDH

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2004
    Messages:
    908
    Likes Received:
    36
    " I don't think an entire guild should be held accountable for 1 person"

    Holding the guild accountable for the one, has long been the practice on Siege since the earliest of days. You are the company you keep. Guild reputation used to, and still should be, paramount. If someone in your guild is not representing your guild as you expect, then boot them. Guildless people used to be Kill On Sight, which is one of the reasons NEW was founded. Guilds who could not keep their people in line suffered accordingly. NEW was special.
     
    #8 Donal Mor, Dec 19, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2012
  9. IanJames

    IanJames Certifiable
    Stratics Veteran Alumni

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    1,769
    Likes Received:
    101
    Sounds good :)