1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice
  3. The Broadsword team is seeking alternative castle designs! Learn more and discuss here!
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Publish 97 is currently on TC1! They are currently focusing on the training aspect of the pet revamp. Head to TC1 and send in your feedback or discuss here!
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Broadsword is hosting a 20th Anniversary Party for UO this September! Learn more here. Will you be there, Guest?
    Dismiss Notice
  6. A new State of Stratics is up. Check it out here!
    Dismiss Notice

Do you think spellbooks should be subject to disarm?

Discussion in 'UHall' started by Lames, Aug 23, 2009.

?

Should spellbooks be subject to disarm?

  1. Yes

    13 vote(s)
    72.2%
  2. No

    5 vote(s)
    27.8%
  1. Lames

    Lames Guest

    I'm just curious as to what people think. I just can't see why spellbooks should be disarmed. To me the only reason why wrestling was still useful was because you could use a spellbook with decent mods. Now everyone may as well run with a mage-wep if they are just going to be disarmed anyway.
     
  2. Gellor

    Gellor Guest

    You can still use a spellbook with decent mod... but the smart PvPer doesn't choose CRITICAL mods for their spellbook... like LRC, FC, and FCR.

    I use my spellbooks for three things:
    1) slayers
    2) 12 free mana (int and mana inc book)
    3) mana regen

    OTOH, I haven't been disarmed in a LONG time especially since they made it so shields don't disarm... yup wrestle parry mage with 70ish dci:thumbsup: