1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Important Information About This Forum
    Questions posted in this forum are 'moderated' and only viewable by Stratics Admins and Mythic Developers. They will be be set public only when an answer to the question has been provided.
  3. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice
  4. Greetings Guest! Tonights Maintenance is complete and the Stratics Community Wiki is now live. Please see this thread for more details.
    Dismiss Notice

Faction point system & warhorses.

Discussion in 'Ask The Devs' started by Nystul, Dec 2, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Nystul

    Nystul Lore Master
    Stratics Veteran

    May 15, 2008
    Likes Received:
    Will there ever be any plans to clear the faction points system? Some shards have an insane amount of points which really mess with ranking. There's really no need for points to accumulate that high, and it shouldn't be achieveable by normal gameplay. It's obvious which shards are an issue, and comparable to other shards without any abuse towards the point system, the difference between shard overalls is simply amazing.

    Basically, will this ever be cleared & will the way points are distributed be tweaked in a way it don't happen again? It just makes no sense for people to be holding millions & billions of points accross a guild & characters who do not participate in factions (on the characters holding the points... IE; a 50/50 med/mage new character), with the only reason to do so, is to affect the other players in that faction.

    Also, can we introduce a new way for players to obtain warhorses? Either through the faction collection boxes that require an increased amount of silver, or a permanent breeder accessable by all. I shouldn't even have to explain the importance of a warhorse, or why they're so desireable by people participating in factions now, but there's some shards & factions that have a terrible time trying to get horses because of the unbalanced distribution of players among some factions. There's a lot of players who think it shouldn't be allowed, but why not? It's a bit absurd that I was able to transfer over X amount of warhorses to another shard recently & sell them at half to a dozen mils per with little effort just so others can finally obtain theirs.
  2. Phoenix_Mythic

    Phoenix_Mythic UO Legend
    VIP Stratics Veteran

    Aug 25, 2009
    Likes Received:
    We are working on a prototype of a new scoring system for Factions right now. The plan is to publish it to a Test Center once it's ready, in order both to test it with lots of players and to give y'all an opportunity to give feedback on it.

    Once it's tested, tweaked, re-tested, etc. and we're happy with it, it'll go into a live publish. The new system will be significantly different in design from the old one, built in such a way that it'll be difficult enough to exploit that it would be easier just to go out and fight for real. There won't be any carry forward of old score information, so it will be a complete reset.

    We're not ready to discuss the details of how the new system will work yet. We want to get it out on Test Center and let you experience it for yourself before we start discussing the details of the design. Theory crafting is fine but I believe a working proof-of-concept is a hundred times better.

    The new scoring system will mean a new way of assigning ranks, and a new way of obtaining faction bennies -- not just horses, but equipment and consumables as well. The most important design goal here is to make it so that you have to actually participate in faction PvP in order to reap the rewards of having these things. That's only fair!

    Again, we're not to the point where we are ready to talk about the details, but we will be before long. Stay tuned!
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.