1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice

houses 1 per account

Discussion in 'UHall' started by mudman, Aug 17, 2009.

  1. mudman

    mudman Guest

    i think uo should redo the housing situation and let every account that plays on more than 1 shard they should be able to place a house on every shard that they play, and to make it better everyhouse that an account places on other shards that the house owner should have to log in on that account for a couple hrs each month. ive been on uo for going on 10 yrs and i think that would help the returing players as well as existing players
     
  2. Flora Green

    Flora Green Guest

    I think we should be allowed two houses, per account, two seperate shards of choice. Any size, no restrictions and definitely NOT have to refresh the second house. Too often, things happen IRL that interfere with gameplay. If I'm in the hospital, I'm not going to be thinking about that house refresh every two weeks.

    Also, how many people play more than two shards regularly? A house on your main and another on one other shard should be sufficient. All my opinions, of course.
     
  3. Dragonchilde

    Dragonchilde Guest

    No, the land should not be taken up by a bunch of people who do not play. being able to place a house is kinda nice... no one needs hoarding spaceon every single shard.
     
  4. RichDC

    RichDC Guest

    I gotta disagree with this, ive heard arguments for ages on siege about allowing an extra house over there.

    My conclusin was just no. There are already to many disused houses around which havent fel(people still paying i guess) that to allow more would be insane.

    If...IF it was allowed it to me would have to be back to the refresh way of old, which if memory serves was a month from start to fall.
     
  5. TheGrayGhost

    TheGrayGhost Guest

    Yeah, I vote no. Want an additional house, then get an additional account. Not trying to be mean, housing just really needs to be limited to one per account. I mean if I could have a house on every shard then whats stopping me from grabbing up prime realistate and holding on to it till I sale it?

    One house per account just works better, those people hoarding houses hoping to make a buck off of it have to eventually decided "Crap I've already spent $300 holding this darn house, is it worth it?".
     
  6. I really miss the days when we had small towers on other shards.
     
  7. guum

    guum Guest

    Didn't we just have this discussion last week?
     
  8. Zayin666

    Zayin666 Lore Keeper
    Stratics Veteran

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    781
    Likes Received:
    6
    Uhm yes :) I started a simular thread not too long ago :)
    I ended up activating my other account, so I can have a house both on Siege and Europa :)
     
  9. Black Sun

    Black Sun Grand Poobah
    Stratics Veteran Alumni

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2003
    Messages:
    5,361
    Likes Received:
    19
    It's on auto refresh in UHall. We have it every week.
     
  10. Setnaffa

    Setnaffa Certifiable
    Stratics Veteran

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,537
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'll say the same thing I always say when this topic comes up: 486 housing tiles per account. That comes out to 1 castle, 1 18x18 plus anther 142 tiles left, or 6 9x9's.

    Regardless, it will never happen because players would cancel accounts that are just holding houses and EA/Mythic would lose alot of money.