1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice

Mugen vs Siege

Discussion in 'UHall' started by TheScoundrelRico, Jan 26, 2009.

  1. TheScoundrelRico

    TheScoundrelRico Stratics Legend
    Stratics Veteran Alumni Stratics Legend Secret Society

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2001
    Messages:
    35,539
    Likes Received:
    908
    To the devs...(if the current team knows).

    Why was Mugen given a Trammel facet, even though there are no Trammel rules on their Trammel...it actually follows the Fel ruleset.

    Why wasn't it created just as Siege was...no Trammel at all?...la
     
  2. God_Majere

    God_Majere Guest

    thankfully Siege doesnt' have more land... esh! hard enough as it is to find other players.
     
  3. TheScoundrelRico

    TheScoundrelRico Stratics Legend
    Stratics Veteran Alumni Stratics Legend Secret Society

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2001
    Messages:
    35,539
    Likes Received:
    908
    Oh trust me, I don't want more land. I play Mugen as well as Siege, and yes, the added facet is pretty tiresome.

    On a side note...if you can't find people on Siege...you aren't looking in the right spots, lol...la
     
  4. God_Majere

    God_Majere Guest

    Oh I am not saying I can't find peeps, just that adding more land would spread peeps out even more... man the idea of having to crawl mirrored dungeons to find someone to pk... yar?
     
  5. Restroom Cowboy

    Restroom Cowboy Visitor

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2008
    Messages:
    3,283
    Likes Received:
    0
    Put down the sugar and the candy and step away from the PC. Thanks!
     
  6. Sir_Bolo

    Sir_Bolo Sage
    Stratics Veteran Stratics Legend

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Messages:
    645
    Likes Received:
    88
    Mugen was opened ~ 2001, at some time between the Third Dawn and Lord Blackthorn's Revenge expansions. At that time, the main focus of the Live Team were the Scenarios, which started to introduce substanstial differences between the Trammel and Felucca landmasses (e.g. the Yew swamps).

    For Siege Perilous, every time the Live Team had to find a way to cram the Trammel scenario content into Felucca; sometimes they just manually copied over the stuff - e.g. Nystul's tower in Castle Britannia's courtyard - while other times they left it out entirely - e.g. the Collector's Quest until recently.

    For Mugen, the Dev Team at the time probably thought that it would be much more convenient to simply have both facets and forget about having to redirect the Trammel scenario stuff...
     
  7. SoulWeaver

    SoulWeaver King of The Bearded Ladies
    Stratics Veteran

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    6,537
    Likes Received:
    729
    Hell No! No Trammel! Hell No, No Trammel! Go Siege Go! Mugen should be combined with siege! Victorious! Everyone Should Be With Siege! Go Siege Go! Who Ever Said To Put The PC Down Hell No H20!


    Make it easier to get heartwoods or increase the %'s dammnitz!@
     
  8. TheScoundrelRico

    TheScoundrelRico Stratics Legend
    Stratics Veteran Alumni Stratics Legend Secret Society

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2001
    Messages:
    35,539
    Likes Received:
    908
    What are you talking about? I never suggested that Siege get Trammel? ROFL...la