New Changes from a "Players" Perspective.... Everytime there is a new upgrade or changes made to the game, there is a considerable amount of rants and dislikes expressed about those changes. Some even leading to players giving up thier accounts for total dislike of new additions or nerfs. I realize that the job of the developers is to create new and attention getting suppliments to an already awesome game, but from my perspective, I feel like the decision of which changes and additions are implemented should be directly influenced by the players, aka customers. How hard would it be for the devs to post thier ideas of new changes or additons and have players actually vote on those they wish to be added or subtracted from the game? Example: Devs posted Idea 1: We would make a One Eyed Purple People Eater that would roam the lands in search of Gms that were actually playing the game and they would be eaten alive and spit back out as a tree stump for players to practice Lumberjacking on. YES X NO I think it would be more productive in the long run to know up front what the majority of the players would accept as a good addition as apposed to the ranting and lose of players due to new impliments that they totally dislike. I understand that one of the best parts of any new publish is the "surprise affect" of what is actually added. But, if we were given a vast number of ideas of which to choose from (by voting), then the Dev Team could decide for themselfs which ones were added or nerfed. The whole idea is for the Devs to come up with the ideas, mainly because they do research the economy and what is best for the game, but at the same time give the players (customers) those ideas that the majority would want to see in the game.