1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice

New to shame and loot help

Discussion in 'UO Europa' started by lancelot99, Jul 24, 2012.

  1. lancelot99

    lancelot99 Guest

    I came across this ring in shame and wondered if it was good or tash ...

    Mace fighting +15
    Int bonus 10
    Fast cast recovery 4
    Lower reg cost 20%
    Damage increase 25%
    Luck - 100

    Any offers or just unravel?
     
  2. Serafi

    Serafi Babbling Loonie
    Stratics Veteran Stratics Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2004
    Messages:
    2,069
    Likes Received:
    17
    The combination of those mods might not be optimal. But then again I am not updated on the latest templates used either. Mace fighting and LRC? Hmm - maybe? At least it doesn`t have any negatives other than the - luck. I would say keep it. The Int, FCR and LRC is very good.
     
  3. John II SRC

    John II SRC Lore Master
    Stratics Veteran Stratics Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,018
    Likes Received:
    18
    Mages often like mace fighting and I think it's a weapon of choice for Necromancers, too. So it's actually a really nice ring for those who like a little magic in their fighting. What lets it down though is the lack of spellchanneling ... no idea if that can still be added, but I am afraid not.
     
  4. Jonathen

    Jonathen Sage
    Stratics Veteran

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2009
    Messages:
    515
    Likes Received:
    32
    If it's a ring - then no, it cannot be spell channelling ;)
     
  5. John II SRC

    John II SRC Lore Master
    Stratics Veteran Stratics Legend

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,018
    Likes Received:
    18
    Sheesh *slaps forehead* what would a ring need spellchanneling for anyway ... I am getting old ... or should simply start reading the whole post before playing wise-guy *g*