1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice
  3. The Broadsword team is seeking alternative castle designs! Learn more and discuss here!
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Broadsword is hosting a 20th Anniversary Party for UO this September! Learn more here. Will you be there, Guest?
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Greetings Guest, Having Login Issues? Check this thread!
    Dismiss Notice

Please help me assess these weapons?

Discussion in 'UO Siege Perilous' started by Guest, Apr 7, 2008.

  1. Guest

    Guest Guest

    Assessing usefulness in pvm combat, marks out of 10 (or a suggested reasonable price). This is to help me price them to go in the 'pvm weapons' bag on my vendor.

    If by any remote chance any should be considered suitable for pvp (doubtful) I'll accept bids in the thread. No pm bids please.

    <font color="blue">wounding assassin spike: air elemental slayer, hit harm 15%, hci 13%, fc 1, di 43% physical damage 100%
    kryss: HLA 34%, mage weapon -22, SSI 30%, di 43%, physical damage 100%
    dagger: HLL 50%, hci 13%, di 43%, poison resist 10%, physical damage 100%
    ruby mace: hit magic arrow 48%, HLD 42%, di 59%, physical damage 100%
    ruby mace: HSL 44%, hci 8%, di 48%, UBWS, physical damage 100% </font>
  2. unfortunately they don't look to me too have much PvP potential. one of the maces has potential but the rest I wouldn't look at too much.

    agh get bak tuu wurk makr!!!!!
  3. Guest

    Guest Guest

    That's expected, it was their usefulness in pvm I was trying to assess.

    I don't think I can make good pvp weapons, or at least I haven't managed it up to yet.