1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice

To UHOH

Discussion in 'UO Chesapeake' started by Ls Jax Ls, Dec 19, 2009.

  1. Ls Jax Ls

    Ls Jax Ls Visitor

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    709
    Likes Received:
    0
    Dear UHOH,

    I know things on chessy must be very busy for you guys owning everyone and all...but your friends on lake superior need help! I felt the need to reach out for them since they are too dillusional to think that they need it. Since you guys stopped playing over there it has been even numbers and quite frankly we need more of a challenge. I remember a few months ago you guys could pull 20+ easily what happened! Anyway, just thought I'd try to get the old gang back together again as things are getting quite desperate on LS. Thanks guys.

    Your Friend,
    Jax
     
  2. Bombastic Fail

    Bombastic Fail Certifiable
    Stratics Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2008
    Messages:
    1,514
    Likes Received:
    112
    Cut3 doesnt = RUOH/UHOH/RUHO


    They were with us for a while on LS only, and thats it.
     
  3. Ls Jax Ls

    Ls Jax Ls Visitor

    Joined:
    May 26, 2009
    Messages:
    709
    Likes Received:
    0
    Where does it say cut3 in my post?
     
  4. Bombastic Fail

    Bombastic Fail Certifiable
    Stratics Veteran

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2008
    Messages:
    1,514
    Likes Received:
    112
    Ok. Just because you see a [COM] doesnt mean it us, k?

    BC we have NO active players on that shard atm. We go there when there is no one to fight on.. (In this order)

    1. Chesapeake
    2. Catskills
    3. Great Lakes
    4. Lake Superior

    Notice how low that shard ranks on our importance list? ;)


    So to say we are "losing fights" or "getting owned" makes 0 sense because we arent on there to lose fights?