1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice

Why does seige allow only one char?

Discussion in 'UHall' started by Guest, Feb 6, 2008.

  1. Guest

    Guest Guest

    I would like to try Siege again, but I already have a developed their there and I don't want to delete him.
     
  2. Guest

    Guest Guest

    You could use another account or choose different skills on your existing character. Perhaps using soulstones.

    The reason they do it is to make it harder to be self sufficient. It is supposed to be a veteran's shard and not easy to be successful. Kind of like the old days on every shard.
     
  3. Sakkarah

    Sakkarah UO Legend
    VIP Stratics Veteran Stratics Legend

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2004
    Messages:
    1,332
    Likes Received:
    11
    Others can correct me if I'm wrong but I believe it was to force player interaction, community and RP. With a single char, you couldn't be the self-sufficient do-it-all that everyone else is on every other shard. You have to chose what you want to be and become it through and through (or open a 2nd account [​IMG]).


    EDIT: Bleh, what PeteAxe beat me to the post!
     
  4. Guest

    Guest Guest

    Aye that was more the original intent to enable us to be needing someone else for things & self sufficient NOT, hense one chr. skills only went up to 100.0s and so forth. Toss in pwr scrolls and soulstones soul stone fragments and it almost is just antiquated silliness now........we can become AN ARMY or a VILLAGE with even just one chr. if we have all the soulstones soulstone fragments out there or can afford to buy em ...............and be 120s in everything to boot on one chr. needing less anyone buy our own mega templated over scrolled over soulstone selves at times.

    *rolls eyes* at this point in UO age and history.........silly almost to keep the one chr. per allotment on Siege when SOME on Siege are their own village on JUST ONE chr. even ..toss in multiple accts many of us there have........it is almost SILLY now to prohibit just one chr. per acct.

    I would go for 2 myself per acct on siege. Nowadays esp post pwr scrolls post aos post soulstones galore overdosing the world of uo even on siege, two chrs per acct. could/would permit those newer less wealthy and with just one acct.

    yet not full of soulstones like the rest to make a new template...be something else have a bit more fun and not locked in to ONE chr. per acct. nor have to feel they must farm gp galore to have to buy all the soulstones many others there DO own with myriads of skills stored up even for ONE chr. per every acct they own there as is.


    Many would disagree with me.........but then some of them don't look in the mirror of their 10-20 +++ soulstones of skills stored up per chr. of their one chr. per one acct.... of their multiple accts [​IMG] on Siege.
     
  5. Guest

    Guest Guest

    if you started playing Siege early with a bunch of characters you can have five characters on one account.
     
  6. Guest

    Guest Guest

    I would love to have a second character on Siege. I'd give it all the crafter skills I can't fit on my existing character so that I could offer a full range of goods on my vendors.

    Starting another account is not an option, we already have 3, but my husband has the other 2 Siege slots.
     
  7. I wish they'd have never put soulstones on Siege.
     
  8. Guest

    Guest Guest

    I was thinking I would like to have a warrior char on siege, but I just don't have the soulstones and as ridiculous as this sounds I just can't afford a 2nd account.
     
  9. Guest

    Guest Guest

    <blockquote><hr>

    if you started playing Siege early with a bunch of characters you can have five characters on one account.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    thats not true, siege was a recreation of another shard called Abyss that was taken down i dont know why and changed into siege.

    Siege has always had the 1 character per account rule, and i dont think there are any accounts in existance with more than 1 character on them on siege.
     
  10. nickdafunk

    nickdafunk Guest

    <blockquote><hr>

    <blockquote><hr>

    if you started playing Siege early with a bunch of characters you can have five characters on one account.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    thats not true, siege was a recreation of another shard called Abyss that was taken down i dont know why and changed into siege.

    Siege has always had the 1 character per account rule, and i dont think there are any accounts in existance with more than 1 character on them on siege.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    Abyss? My gawd, that rings a very vague bell with me in connection to Seig.

    Man that was a while ago, i was back in High School then *Laughs*
     
  11. Guest

    Guest Guest

    <blockquote><hr>

    <blockquote><hr>

    if you started playing Siege early with a bunch of characters you can have five characters on one account.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    thats not true, siege was a recreation of another shard called Abyss that was taken down i dont know why and changed into siege.

    Siege has always had the 1 character per account rule, and i dont think there are any accounts in existance with more than 1 character on them on siege.

    [/ QUOTE ]

    and the name is way cooler than "Siege Perilous". :p