1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice
  3. Greetings Guest, Having Login Issues? Check this thread!
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Hail Guest!,
    Please take a moment to read this post reminding you all of the importance of Account Security.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Author Wes Locher has teamed up with Stratics for a giveaway of his new book Braving Britannia. This book explores the history and impact of Ultima Online and includes interviews from current and past dev team members as well as many UO and Stratics community members. Click here for more details!
    Dismiss Notice

EM Site Feed And Justice For All?????

Discussion in 'UO Europa' started by UO News, Apr 14, 2015.

  1. UO News

    UO News RSS Feed
    RSS Feed Stratics Veteran

    Jan 30, 2009
    Likes Received:
    Reading the request from Skaros regarding the death of Bladderstick, Lord Sparrow had certain misgivings. Certainly the manner of his death was unsatisfactory and contrary to the rule of law but what purpose could be served by reporting on people talking/gossiping about it?. He had heard a husband and wife arguing about it in Britain, the husband, Laetha was in full support of his demise and the wife, Allyn, opposed, she argued correctly, that it was mob rule and contrary to what should be expected of a civilised society. Whether Laetha actually took part in his summary execution is unknowable, but probable, yet what purpose would be served by knowing?.

    There are also a group of Ladies in Nujelm celebrating his passing, they are dancing with joy and bearing in mind the suffering imposed by him in Nujelm, who can blame them?.

    As to attaching the blame relating to his death to anyone, Lord Sparrow feels the Crown itself must bear some responsibility. His trial was a travesty, poorly conducted, with the public roaming freely in the court rather than being excluded from proximity to the court and its officers.

    Outside the court afterwards, again there was no attempt to prevent access to the prisoner he was allowed to be surrounded by an obviously angry crowd, where were the contingent of guards who should have been there to prevent this?. If you wish the rule of law to prevail there are steps to be taken to ensure it, these were lacking.

    As a consequence the incensed crowd took the law into their own hands, which forethought should have foretold. It is an established fact that a mob has no mind of its own, it quickly reaches fever pitch and we have seen what happens next. To what end then investigating afterwards? you cannot punish a mob, there are no ringleaders, the whole are guilty to a greater or lesser degree, any opposed are overwhelmed by the huge majority and anarchy prevails, anarchy is a failure of government.

    Bladderstick was responsible for a lot of suffering to a lot of people, his guilt could hardly be called into question, so to allow many of them to be close to him was a major error.

    As I feel that much of the blame lies elsewhere I shall report no further on possible members of the crowd present that day and conclude by simply saying there are lessons to be learned from the unfortunate manner of his passing.


    Continue reading...