1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Greetings Guest!!

    In order to combat SPAM on the forums, all users are required to have a minimum of 2 posts before they can submit links in any post or thread.

    Dismiss Notice
  3. The Broadsword team is seeking alternative castle designs! Learn more and discuss here!
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Broadsword is hosting a 20th Anniversary Party for UO this September! Learn more here. Will you be there, Guest?
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Greetings Guest, Having Login Issues? Check this thread!
    Dismiss Notice

Question #1

Discussion in 'Question of the Week' started by Bo Riddler, Aug 30, 2007.

  1. Bo Riddler

    Bo Riddler Guest

    Is it fair to only allow certain races to be certain classes? Why or Why not?

    Example. Gnomes cannot be Priests. Forsaken cannot be Paladins.
  2. Bo Riddler

    Bo Riddler Guest

    Let me be the first to answer the poll question since I posted it. But please toss in your two coppers.

    Keeping in mind each race has racial abilities, I think some rules should be relaxed. Let us play the class on the race that we want.

  3. RayneStorm

    RayneStorm Guest

    I have to agree Bo...but also disagree to a lesser degree. Hence I voted to let the classes be free.

    My argument...lore would be forever screwed. Warlock Tauren? PALADIN Troll? OMGWTFBBQ Gnome DRUID? Would be a bit odd methinks. :)
  4. Eldorian

    Eldorian Guest

    I didn't vote because the reasons don't fit in with how I feel.

    The reason I like it the way it is has nothing to do with game balance, but everything to do with Warcraft Lore. There's a reason in the lore that the races are what classes they are and I think that adds more depth to the game.
  5. Guest

    Guest Guest

    What Eld said. I totally agree. A game has its lore, you need to stick with it.
  6. Guest

    Guest Guest

    got it right on the nose Eld.... i have to agree wholely